But women in the New York City Council are sliding backward. A decade ago, they held 18 seats, the most ever. Term limits partly account for the subsequent decline. Those limits forced some women to leave, and men ended up being elected in their stead. The dwindled numbers impelled members of the Councilâs womenâs caucus to warn in a report last month that âwe face a systemic crisis of representation.â
That the very nature of a legislature can be shaped by gender balance is self-evident. This is true on a broad range of issues, but conspicuously so on matters like child care, maternity leave and preventive cancer screenings. At the federal level, how could heads not shake in May when Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, formed his working group on health care? He initially thought it was fine to go with 13 men and no women.
âWomen legislators bring with them lived experiences and crucial viewpoints that allow them to identify and take on the unique challenges that women face,â the New York womenâs caucus aptly said.
Womenâs light presence in government is not a case of their faring worse than men at the ballot box. The CUNY Institute for State and Local Governance, a research group at the City University of New York, found that the sexes win or lose elections nationwide at about the same rates. The issue, the institute said in a report last September, is that women tend not to run for office in the first place.
Why is that? Some social scientists cite traditional family arrangements that limit womenâs career choices. Researchers at the Brookings Institution have perceived what might be called an ambition gap, with women underestimating their abilities and their chances for success. It makes them less likely than men to even think about seeking public office, or to have political professionals encourage them to run.
This weekâs voting in New York may have reflected that. In a total of 113 Democrats…